spot_img
Thursday, December 12, 2024
spot_img
HomeLatestMaBLEM clarifies its request to have Ombudsman probed over Buluma recruitment determination

MaBLEM clarifies its request to have Ombudsman probed over Buluma recruitment determination

By Watipaso Mzungu

MaBLEM chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba

Malawi Civil Society Led Black Economic Empowerment Movement (MaBLEM)
has disclosed that its request to the Parliamentary Public Appointments Committee (PAC) to have Ombudsman Grace Tikambenji Malera probed over irregular and unprocedural recruitment of Ms. Hellen Buluma at National Oil Company of Malawi (NOCMA) was not motivated by
malice and ill-will.

MaBLEM chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba and his national coordinator, Fryson Chodzi, say they have given an “ability of events and developments, including bottlenecks in the fuel supply chain, which they feel is enough reason for Malera to be investigated’.

“The people she is alleged to have met are the big furies behind fuel supply, bigger even than the Sattar alleged corruption as it alleges politicians both serving and old have benefitted from these cartels,” explained Mkwezalamba and Chodzi on Saturday.

On November 2, 2022, MaBLEM wrote PAC Chairperson Joyce Chitsulo, copying the Secretary to the President and Cabinet, requesting the Committee to investigate the Ombudsman for alleged gross misconduct in handling the inquiry on allegations of unprocedural and irregular recruitment of Buluma as Deputy Chief Executive Officer for NOCMA and the chairpersonship of the Secretary to the President and Cabinet of various parastatal boards.

In the letter, which Nyasa Times has seen, the movement’s chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba and his national coordinator, Fryson Chodzi, argue that Ombudsman Grace Tikambenji Malera erred by investigating the matter while knowing fully well that both matters were before the courts.

Mkwezalamba and Chodzi further argue that the NOCMA Board was not
given the right to be heard, which undermines the rules of natural justice.

“During the public inquiry where Ms. Buluma was summoned to make submissions, she openly raised concerns that the Ombudsman was compromised and was being influenced through involvement by big fuel haulage transporters who wanted NOCMA to use ex-tank so that they can continue collecting brokerage fees, which is charged to the pump price.

We also note a deliberate omission of this fact in the released report by the Ombudsman on the matter,” reads part of the letter to PAC.

However, some members of the society felt uncomfortable with the request to have Ombudsman investigated over her determination on Buluma’s recruitment.

They condemned MaBLEM for alleged overstepping of its mandate. However, in its press statement released on Friday afternoon, Mkwezalamba and Chodzi have defended their action, stating that their position was misquoted or misunderstood by some quarters of the society.

They have highlighted key challenges, which they say have necessitated their writing to PAC.

“The Ombudsman, while acknowledging in her determination the fact that similar matters were before the courts i.e. Criminal case no 934 of 2021 and Civil case no: 121 of 2022, she nevertheless proceeded to make determinations on the same thereby rendering and undermining the ongoing court cases through her determination.

We noted that her determination gravely faulted the NOCMA Board both the previous, and
current, but made no attempts to invite them to be heard on the allegations before making or releasing her determination,” reads the statement in part.

Mkwezalamba and Chodzi further highlight that an allegation that the whole investigation was influenced by fuel transporters and other politicians with interests and that the Ombudsman was being induced by some of a certain grouping was never highlighted in her determination report neither did she challenge it when it was raised.

“We are aware that there is a lot going on under the procurement and
supply of fuel in Malawi as NOCMA has highly opted for DDU method of procuring fuel as opposed to Ex-tank system which is costing Malawians Billions but being preferred because it has a chain of beneficiaries that are milking Malawians.

 It is clear some of her determinations have serious impact on the Laws of Malawi i.e. the Constitution on the rights of workers and mandate of NOCMA versus that of Ombudsman as well as Employment Act among others on the rights and entitlements employees have,” they stress.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular